[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random.
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:59:40 -0500 |
Ralph wrote:
> I've been experimenting with send(1)'s `-msgid -messageid random'
> invocation. If nmh is left to add the MIME headers, the default, then
> Content-IDs get whacked in that look an awful lot like a `-messageid
> localname', the default.
>
> Should -messageid random affect Content-ID too?
It should. I don't have the cycles to fix it now. I'd be willing
to add a note to the man page to use mhbuild -nocontentid, if you
want. I use that (for another reason), so I never noticed this
problem.
> Are there any others lurking to bite?
Based on grep of ID_FIELD, I think that's the only one. The other
uses all go through message_id(), which obeys -messageid random.
David
- [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random.,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ken Hornstein, 2017/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ken Hornstein, 2017/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., David Levine, 2017/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ralph Corderoy, 2017/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., David Levine, 2017/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Paul Vixie, 2017/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., David Levine, 2017/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Domain Leakage Despite -messageid random., Ken Hornstein, 2017/01/08