Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

[Leonardo Taccari]

Hello Ken,

Ken Hornstein writes:
> [...]
> I am feeling reasonably confident about the quality of nmh 1.7 release
> candidate 3. To that end, I sure would appreciate it if you had not had
> a chance yet to test any nmh 1.7 release candidates, that you give RC3 a
> try.  If there are no issues with RC3 I hope to go to 1.7 final within
> a week or two; widespread testing would greatly assist this process.  So
> if you have a moment or two to spare, give RC3 a try and let us know how
> it works for you. If you've already done that, then thank you!
> [...]

That's a great news!

Back on how it works... I can confirm that the several bugs that
affected early 1.7 RCs and I was able to reproduce are fixed on 1.7RC3.
I have also run the tests on NetBSD/amd64 8.99.1 against 1.7RC3 and...:

 [...]
 ====================
 All 110 tests passed
 (1 test was not run)
 ====================
 [...]

(the 1 test not run was the one that required valgrind, so it was
expected and not a regression).


Thank you and all nmh developers and community that made that possible!
Keep up the good work!