[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again
From: |
Michael Richardson |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:55:58 -0400 |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> So, the most recent discussion about IMAP started me thinking ... how
> bad would a connection for every command really be?
Premature optimization being the root of all evil...
...
> Now, we'd have to TOTALLY rethink the internal API to make this work;
I think that's worth doing.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] address@hidden http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, valdis . kletnieks, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, valdis . kletnieks, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again,
Michael Richardson <=