Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?

[David Levine]

Paul wrote:

> as far as i can tell, the -noprint switch to the folder command
> is inoperative, since a line of code just below the argument parsing
> loop sets the default value of printsw to be non-zero.

Yeah, looks like it's always (at least since 1989/06/26) been that way.
I use -f(ast), but it looks like -noprint would be a bit more efficient.

> i also see that -noprint isn't documented.  perhaps not a coincidence?
>
> i can fix it, if it seems that i'm reading this right.

Sure.

David