[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:04:56 -0500 |
david wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
> > as far as i can tell, the -noprint switch to the folder command
> > is inoperative, since a line of code just below the argument parsing
> > loop sets the default value of printsw to be non-zero.
>
> Yeah, looks like it's always (at least since 1989/06/26) been that way.
> I use -f(ast), but it looks like -noprint would be a bit more efficient.
but that still prints the folder name, doesn't it? i think -noprint
might be totally silent. (of course, since it doesn't work, i don't
actually know. :-)
paul
> > i also see that -noprint isn't documented. perhaps not a coincidence?
> >
> > i can fix it, if it seems that i'm reading this right.
>
> Sure.
>
> David
>
> --
> Nmh-workers
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
>
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 1.9 degrees)
- [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, valdis . kletnieks, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/09