[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?
From: |
Todd Neal |
Subject: |
Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:31:20 -0600 |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:24:06 -0700, Dmitri A. Sergatskov <address@hidden> wrote:
...
> > Can you test and see if modifying __kluge_procbuf_delay__ fixes the problem
> > ?
> >
> > octave:39> __kluge_procbuf_delay__=10
> > __kluge_procbuf_delay__ = 10
> >
> > Todd
>
> Sure it does. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> Dmitri.
> --
>
Maybe it should be changed in the oct-procbuf.cc file. By default it
is set to 0:
// Number of microseconds to delay in the parent after forking.
static int Vkluge_procbuf_delay = 0;
I'm not sure if 10 is the best value but it seemed to stop the problem
under Linux as well.
Todd
- 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/11
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/11
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/14
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/14
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/14
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/15