|
From: | Bill Denney |
Subject: | Re: Changing usage to print_usage |
Date: | Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:00:58 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, John W. Eaton wrote:
| scripts/Changelog: | | 2006-10-09 Bill Denney <address@hidden> | * *.m: change almost all occurrances of usage() to print_usage() I would also like to have these changes. I tried to apply this patch, but I hit errors like patch: **** malformed patch at line 64: @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@several times. I don't understand why this is happening. Can you please try to generate the patch again and then check to be sure that you are able to apply it to the original sources before you send it?
Sorry, I hand-edited the diff file to fix problems that I found as I went. Apparently I can't fool it. Here is a version that I tested against fresh sources.
Bill -- "I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself." -- Ronald Reagan
print_usage.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |