Re: graphics future

[Daniel J Sebald]

Daniel J Sebald wrote:

> a composite of lines.  It seems to me the complication is (and the 
> reason for the "type/tag", as opposed to simply a more extensive list of 
> "type") that MathWorks wanted to make changes for the reasons you state, 
> but they also wanted/needed to maintain backward compatibility.

Of course, when one thinks about it, this really isn't compatible in the sense 
that someone has to go back to their code and add 'v6' arguments in various places.

Dan