Re: Comparing speed of Octave binaries on cygwin

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> On 9/4/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
>   
>> Using Oregonator ODE (source was placed at the end of the
>> mail), we compare the solving time
>>
>> octave 2.9.13 built with  gcc-3.4.4-3 in cygwin package
>> octave:1> testOregoB
>> ans =  9.2500
>>
>> octave 2.1.73 binary in cygwin package
>> octave:1> testOregoB
>> ans = 7.0930
>>
>> my testing binary built specially confgiured gcc.
>> octave:1> testOregoB
>> ans =  2.7030
>>     
>
> Just for the record, I tested your script on my MSVC-built version
> and compared to your cygwin-compiled version. While the cygwin
> version gives 2.8440, the MSVC version gives 4.1875. However,
> the MSVC version I used contains debugging info. An optimized
> version (a 2.9.12+ test package I still have installed) gives 1.8438.
>
> Michael.
>
>   
Given the speed difference could we perhaps update the binary MSVC
release without the debug info?

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary