[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redirectable octave?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Redirectable octave? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:59:23 +0200 |
On 10/18/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> | Here's a proposal for the standard IO interface that could be used in
> | octave. The idea is then to add 3 FILE* arguments to octave_main and
> | to call octave_standard_streams::init with those 3 args. In the normal
> | case, you end up using std::cin/cout/cerr.
>
> OK, I think this looks good.
OK. I'll continue this way and come with a full patch later. Just a small
question: would this API go into an existing header or would you prefer
a separate one?
Michael.
- Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/15
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/16
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/16
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/17
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18