Re: Redirectable octave?

[John W. Eaton]

On 18-Oct-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:

| On 10/18/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > | Here's a proposal for the standard IO interface that could be used in
| > | octave. The idea is then to add 3 FILE* arguments to octave_main and
| > | to call octave_standard_streams::init with those 3 args. In the normal
| > | case, you end up using std::cin/cout/cerr.
| >
| > OK, I think this looks good.
| 
| OK. I'll continue this way and come with a full patch later. Just a small
| question: would this API go into an existing header or would you prefer
| a separate one?

I'd say define these symbols in a separate header.

Also, should we consider renaming octave_stdout (the one that normally
goes through the pager) to avoid confusion?

jwe