Re: make check recommended practice?

[Muthiah Annamalai]

Moritz Borgmann wrote:
> Now that I'm trying to chase down test failures for my Solaris build, 
> I have a question about the "make check" command.
>
> Whenever one compiles octave with only a subset of libraries (e.g., I 
> don't include support for sparse matrices since we don't need it), 
> then there is a large number of tests that are known already at 
> configure time to fail. However, when looking at the output of make 
> check or fntests.log, it is extremely tedious to look at every of the 
> currently > 150 failures and determine if it's expected to fail or 
> not.
>
> How do people solve this problem? Is there some intelligence built-in 
> that could keep the known-failing tests from running in the first 
> place?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Moritz
>   
I think, you could make a 'Makefile.in' rules that are changed based
on your 'configure', or however test cases must be for library set you 
chose.

Doing this is an entirely different task.. like JWE noted.

-Muthu