Re: Graphics properties implementation

[Michael Goffioul]

On 1/12/08, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> OK, I applied the patch and checked it in.  I needed the attached
> changes to get a clean compile of graphics.cc.  Most of the changes
> had to do with the GCC warning option -Wshadow.
>
> Was there some reason to omit the name handle arguments in some of the
> calls to the base_property constructor?  I added them, but if there
> were intentionally omitted, I can undo that part of my patch.

No, this was a mistake. I detected 3 of them in array_property, any_property
and callback_property respectively. Am I right?

> I think graphics-props.cc should appear in the Makefile somewhere as a
> dependency.

Something like in the attachment?

Michael.

graphics-props.diff
Description: Text document