[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: subspace
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: subspace |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:41:39 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:09 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 20-Mar-2008, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>
> | > I think subspace should give a clear diagnostic if the arguments don't
> | > meet its requirements rather than allowing some subsequent operation
> | > to fail and produce an obscure message like this.
> | >
> |
> | Ok, this changeset fixes that.
>
> I applied it.
>
> BTW, I thought you said you were on vacation?
>
Yes. Just couldn't resist :) Contributing to Octave is so much fun,
and I'm learning a lot from it.
But I think I really should give it a rest for few days. I know I'm
too eager sometimes.
bye
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- subspace, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/03/17
- subspace, John W. Eaton, 2008/03/19
- Re: subspace, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, John W. Eaton, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, John W. Eaton, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: subspace, David Bateman, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, John W. Eaton, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, David Bateman, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, Bill Denney, 2008/03/20
- Re: subspace, Przemek Klosowski, 2008/03/21
- Re: subspace, Ben Abbott, 2008/03/21
- Re: subspace, David Bateman, 2008/03/21
- Re: subspace, Ben Abbott, 2008/03/21