[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2?
|
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
|
Subject: |
Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:43:42 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:08 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd like to consider wrapping Octave's classes in a separate
> namespace. I think we could do it for 3.2, but maybe there is some
> reason to avoid this change? Does anyone have any strong objections
> to doing this? Other comments?
When wrapping into an octave namespace, would you end up (for instance)
with octave::octave_value or with octave::value? More generally, do you
intend to keep the octave_ prefix?.
Michael.