[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about test_io.m
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: Question about test_io.m |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:02:13 +0900 (JST) |
Hello Ben and Jaroslav
Thak you for yor reply and Sorry for my ambiguous writing.
The opts = {"-z -text", "-z -binary", "-z -mat", "-v7"};
seem to make the test fall into infinite loop for my mingw build of octave.
The opts = {"-text", "-binary", "-mat", "-v7"};
went well fine. With unknown reasons, the error by '-z' vanished once and
however it came back soon
:-(.
The above is one of the reason why I asked for.
>Which question? :) If the -z option is tested elsewhere, then it is
probably redundant. If not, then maybe it should.
I have installed gzip in the directory where PATH pointed.
I cannot resolved error.
Regards
Tatsuro
--- Ben Abbott wrote:
Tasuro,
>
> Your question is with regards to the including the compression option,
> "-z" in all options, correct?
>
> I recall some discussion about compression a few weeks ago, but do not
> remember the details.
>
> Why should the "-z" be removed?
>
> Ben
--- Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
Which question? :) If the -z option is tested elsewhere, then it is
probably redundant. If not, then maybe it should.
Maybe with such trivial changes, you can risk making a patch straight
away. I usually mark messages containing patches if I can't deal with
them at the moment, so a patch has a much lower risk of being
forgotten, at least by me.
--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/
Re: Question about test_io.m, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/04/08