[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: overloaded function handles
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: overloaded function handles |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:54:03 -0400 |
On 27-Jul-2009, Robert T. Short wrote:
| FYI. The obviousness concept applies only to the granting of patents.
| The patents that Mathworks holds have been granted and it is now up to
| potential infringers to show that either the patent is really invalid
| because of obviousness or other reason or that the implementation is not
| infringing.
|
| Does someone have a copy of the patent in question?
Search for US patent 6993772 here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm
Other US patents held by the MathWorks are listed here:
http://www.mathworks.com/company/aboutus/policies_statements/patents.html
jwe
- overloaded function handles, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/07/23
- Re: overloaded function handles, Robert T. Short, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: overloaded function handles, John Swensen, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, John W. Eaton, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, Robert T. Short, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, Robert T. Short, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/07/27
- Re: overloaded function handles, Judd Storrs, 2009/07/28
- Re: overloaded function handles, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/07/29
- Re: overloaded function handles, Judd Storrs, 2009/07/29