octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Logos proposal


From: Fotios Kasolis
Subject: Re: Logos proposal
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:48:21 +0200

On Jun 15, 2010, at 4:37 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:

> 2010/6/15 Fotios Kasolis <address@hidden>:
>> Try the following (i like all of them)
>> 1) \mathcal{O}\text{C}^\mathrm{T}\forall\beta\mathcal{E}
>> 2) \mathbb{O}\text{C}^\text{T}\forall\vec{\mathcal{V}}\exists
>> 3) \mathbb{O}\text{C}^\text{T}\forall\vec{\mathcal{V}}e
> 
> I like the first one, except for the beta. It's not phonetically
> equivalent to a v, but I think Greek doesn't distinguish those two
> phonemes.
> 
> All I don't like is the \mathbb{O}, because it doesn't have a common
> meaning I can think of.

Beta is phonetically equivalent to v(!!!). What you wrote with \nu is not 
equivalent because you must read it like "octane" instead.
Regarding \mathbb{O} it is just a matter of taste.
/Fotios




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]