[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave vs Scilab
From: |
Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: |
Re: Octave vs Scilab |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:32:45 -0500 |
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Fotios Kasolis <address@hidden> wrote:
> So I did not manage to reproduce the example which was like 3 times faster
> but here is another example (not that bad)
>
> Windows 7 with binaries Octave 3.2.4 and Scilab 5.2.2 on intel i7 720
>
> octave.exe:1> xmpl
> 32.430
>
> ->exec('C:\Users\fotios\Desktop\xmpl.sce', -1)
> 22.411
>
On 3+ years old Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz / fedora13
/Octave 3.3.52+/scilab 5.2.2
Octave: 30.5 sec
Scilab 27.9 sec
If I swap j and i in A, i.e.:
A(i,j) = i^2 + j^2; change to
A(j,i) = i^2 + j^2;
Octave 29.4
Scilab 27.5
FYI.
Dmitri.
--
- Octave vs Scilab, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab,
Dmitri A. Sergatskov <=
- Octave vs Scilab, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2010/10/06
- Octave vs Scilab, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Fotios Kasolis, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Judd Storrs, 2010/10/06
- Re: Octave vs Scilab, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2010/10/06
- Equalis Octave group, Dave Barnes, 2010/10/07
- Re: Equalis Octave group, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2010/10/07