Re: Savannah Patch Tracker (was: SQP doc patch on savannah)

[John W. Eaton]

On 18-Nov-2010, Kim Hansen wrote:

| On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:49, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > On  2-Nov-2010, David Bateman wrote:
| >
| > | We don't seem to be using the savannah patch tracker. However that
| > | doesn't mean that people aren't sending patches to this tracker. I've
| > | closed one as its been applied, asked for help on another, but the
| > | following patch [...]
| >
| > I propose that we start using the patch tracker.
| >
| > Patches for bug reports can continue to be attached to the bug report,
| > as it makes sense for that information to all stay together.
| >
| > I think we shoul start using the patch tracker for other submitted
| > patches.  So now if people send patches to the maintainers or help
| > list, we should direct them to the patch tracker so the patches won't
| > be lost.
| 
| I think it should be configured to accept patches from people without
| login the same way the bug tracker does.

I thought it was set up that way, but I guess not.  Anyway, I think
I've fixed it.  But I think we will still need to have at least an
email address and name before applying a nontrivial patch from
someone.

jwe