octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: .h.in vs .in.h


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: .h.in vs .in.h
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:31:43 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 04/11/2012 04:16 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
On 11-Apr-2012, Daniel J Sebald wrote:

| Just the fact that the extension is .h and the file really isn't a
| header file.  The only confusion I could see arising is if some IDE (is
| this done anywhere?  Windows compilation perhaps?)

No, Octave uses automake for builds, even on Windows systems.  And
you would still have to list the rules for building .h from .in.h or
your IDE would not know how to build the would not work.

Wow, I really thought this was a completely non-controversial change.
I mean, gnulib already uses this convention, so it's not like I'm
inventing anything new here.

I don't mind the change--makes grep easier. Just trying to think through any foreseeable problems in the build process.

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]