[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: including a new gnulib module
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: including a new gnulib module |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:57:18 -0400 |
On 31 July 2012 12:48, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:10 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>
>> On 30-Jul-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>
>> | I did ...
>> |
>> | cd gnulib
>> | git pull
>> |
>> | ... and a fresh build beginning with autogen finished.
[snip]
>> You should not have needed the git pull. The base64 module was
>> already in the current version of gnulib that we are using. Now if
>> you push a changeset, it will also include an update to gnulib. Maybe
>> it is OK to do that, but please don't mix an update to gnulib in with
>> some other unrelated changeset.
> After "hg update -C" an "hg diff" is empty.
>
> Is it save to assume I'm ok now?
What does "hg summary" say? "hg diff" needs the "--subrepo" flag to
check up on those too.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: including a new gnulib module, (continued)
- Re: including a new gnulib module, John W. Eaton, 2012/07/26
- Re: including a new gnulib module, c., 2012/07/29
- Re: including a new gnulib module, Ben Abbott, 2012/07/30
- Re: including a new gnulib module, Ben Abbott, 2012/07/30
- Re: including a new gnulib module, John W. Eaton, 2012/07/31
- Re: including a new gnulib module, Ben Abbott, 2012/07/31
- Re: including a new gnulib module,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=