octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: segfault during test


From: JuanPi
Subject: Re: segfault during test
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 13:59:20 +0200

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Rik <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 08:39 AM, JuanPi wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Rik <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2012 07:40 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>>>> Message: 2
>>>> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:02:13 +0200
>>>> From: JuanPi <address@hidden>
>>>> To: Octave Maintainers <address@hidden>
>>>> Subject: Fresh build segfault
>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>       <address@hidden>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Compiling on a fresh checkout I get a segmentation fault when running
>>>> "make check" (configured with "./configure" with no flags)
>>>>
>>>> Summary:
>>>>
>>>>   PASS     10472
>>>>   FAIL         1
>>>>   XFAIL        3
>>>>
>>>> See the file test/fntests.log for additional details.
>>>>
>>>> Expected failures (listed as XFAIL above) are known bugs.
>>>> Please help improve Octave by contributing fixes for them.
>>>>
>>>> 356 (of 934) .m files have no tests.
>>>>
>>>> 0 (of 121) .cc files have no tests.
>>>>
>>>> Please help improve Octave by contributing tests for
>>>> these files (see the list in the file fntests.log).
>>>>
>>>> panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...
>>>> panic: attempted clean up apparently failed -- aborting...
>>>> panic: attempted clean up apparently failed -- aborting...
>>>> attempting to save variables to `octave-workspace'...
>>>> panic: attempted clean up apparently failed -- aborting...
>>>> make[1]: *** [check] Aborted (core dumped)
>>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/juanpi/Projects/octave-dev/test'
>>>> make: *** [check] Error 2
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas what can be causing this?
>>> 8/1/12
>>>
>>> Juan,
>>>
>>> I would guess that you might have cruft left over from a previous build.
>>> For example, with the recent change to the src/ directory tree it is
>>> possible that you have dynamically linked functions in the DLD-FUNCTIONS
>>> directory as well as the the built-in versions in the new corefcns
>>> directory.  It is possible that Octave is pulling in an old version of a
>>> function which may have been compiled with different options, etc.
>>>
>>> I would try the following from the top-level directory:
>>> make maintainer-clean   # remove all built objects
>>> find . -name '*.lo'    # find any library objects.  These should be deleted.
>>> find . -name '*.la'    # find any library archives.  These should be 
>>> deleted.
>>> find . -name '*.df'    # find any definition files.  These should be 
>>> deleted.
>>>
>>> Then run the complete build cycle again
>>> ./autogen.sh
>>> ./configure
>>> make
>>>
>>> --Rik
>> Can that be? I am compiling in a repo that was checked out from scratch.
> No.  A brand new repo shouldn't have any cruft.  Is this a plain install on
> a Linux machine?
>
> --Rik

Hi,
The OS is
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-27-generic x86_64)

gcc is
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3

The segfault happens after all test are finished.

-- 
JuanPi Carbajal
-----
"The bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be
followed by a great evil to come, while the true economist pursues a
great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil." - Frédéric
Bastiat
-----
http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]