octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is the src re-org finished ?


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: is the src re-org finished ?
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:56:06 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 08/03/2012 12:38 PM, Max Brister wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Rik<address@hidden>  wrote:
On 08/03/2012 10:00 AM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
On 08/03/2012 11:49 AM, Rik wrote:
On 08/03/2012 08:21 AM, address@hidden wrote:
is the src re-org finished ?
8/3/12

Ben,

It's close.  I checked in another subdirectory this morning and if I don't
run into problems will have the final directory done in a few hours.

Should pt-jit.cc and pt-jit.h be moved to the parse-tree subdirectory?
I already have that question outstanding with Max.  Hopefully he'll get
back to me some time today so I can finalize that.

--Rik

pt-jit.cc and pt-jit.h belong with jit. I'm going to rename them
(probably to jit-convert.cc and jit-convert.h) after I am done with
the patch I'm currently working on.

Max Brister

OK. Another question. When a number of files start accumulating with "jit-" and "oct-" at the beginning, it is effectively the same as a subdirectory. Should these groups be moved to their own subdirectory?

If Rik hasn't done so already, should sparse-xdiv.cc, sparse-xdiv.h, sparse-xpow.cc, sparse-xpow.h be moved to liboctave?

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]