|
| From: | Steven G. Johnson |
| Subject: | Re: [OctDev] complex error function |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:17:50 -0500 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 |
On 11/20/12 8:43 PM, Nir Krakauer wrote:
Can the contributed functions be given names that don't conflict with the current Octave ones, like erf_complex? That way there should be no problem with putting them either in specfun or as their own Octave package.
Sure. Note that I already provide my own Octave package, and that is what I do now with my Octave plugins; they are called Faddeeva_erf, Faddeeva_erfc, etcetera.
You could use some other prefix or postfix, of course. --SGJ
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |