Re: texinfo deftypefn vs deftypefnx on arch linux

[Stefan Husmann]

Am 24.03.2013 17:55, schrieb Amod Mulay:
> I already have on a patch for the doc. issues. Hope to get it pulled soon.
>
> thanks
> Amod
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:49 AM, skinduptruk <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > G'day all!
> >
> > first time post here, i have been lurking in the IRC and finally decided to
> > try out Octave while getting back into linux via arch linux...
> >
> > i cloned from hg and after lots of pkg updates via pacman i finally got
> > octave to build and run (a linux newbie POV of this process might be worth
> > a
> > separate write up!).  however i did need to roll back my texinfo to version
> > 4 like in this bug report:
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38392
> >
> > i think tex functions are worth learning more about, so this bug was of
> > interest.  i'm no expert in tex, so with little experience in what to look
> > for, i have not found many clues in the gnu.org help files like:
> >
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040deffnx.html#g_t_0040deffnx
> >
> >
> > http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/texinfo-4.2/html_mono/texinfo.html#Definition%20Commands
> >
> > in the bug report there is mention of where to find the offending .m files,
> > but any more ideas on the fix itself?  i'm thinking could be something
> > simple like declaring the deftypefnx in a slightly different place or
> > different way to achieve a similar final doc output?  any extra hints are
> > welcome...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kurt.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/texinfo-deftypefn-vs-deftypefnx-on-arch-linux-tp4651158.html
> > Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Where do you have that patch?