Re: Release Plans

[Paryshaan]

Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso-2 wrote
> What was your test, how was mingw slow? I believe it's only the
> startup time that is slow. What BLAS were you using?
> 
> We really want to ensure that mingw is good, because the hope is to
> make official binaries with it. We shouldn't need non-free software to
> build Octave.

I made a new test and the results are as follows:

It was slow on loading a variable which was saved in zip format. it is more
than 8 times slower when i use Octave binaries for Windows Microsoft Visual
Studio on the same system.

time of loading                                                           
variable 1          variable 2

binaries for Windows Microsoft Visual Studio                   2.7   s          
     
113 s
MinGw                                                                          
25.3 s                 989 s


But in other processes it seems its faster!

time of processing                                                      
process 1         process 2      process 2

binaries for Windows Microsoft Visual Studio                 16.09 s           
36.02 s         29.67 s
MinGw                                                                         
10.38 s           24.94 s         18.87 s




-----
Paryshaan
--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Release-Plans-tp4652127p4652797.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.