Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 86, Issue 18

[John W. Eaton]

On 05/13/2013 12:01 AM, Torsten wrote:

> The qscilexeroctave.cpp is quite new and compilation failed with older
> versions of Qscintilla. This is why we still have the lexer_octave_gui
> class.
> If we decide to put only the language keywords into the list I suggest
> to create a second more complete list for the code completion.

I've already removed it.  If we should have additional keywords, then I 
think our lexer class for Octave should be derived from the one that is 
provided with Qscintilla and just overload the keywords function.  That 
function could then get the lists of function and keyword names from 
Octave instead of using a static list.

jwe