[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again
From: |
Thorsten Liebig |
Subject: |
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:26:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
Am 19.11.2013 16:16, schrieb Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso:
> I know we've had this discussion before, but I want to revisit it
> again. I know this is bikeshedding[1], so this will be my final word
> on the matter, I promise. Or at least publicly, if anyone wants to
> keep arguing this with me, we can do so while only the NSA watches.
>
> I really think the next Octave release should be called "Octave 4".
> Not "3.8".
>
> I will restate my case, with a few extra bits of data that we now
> have:
>
> 1) Gauging by the demand for it as well as the development buzz
> that it has spurred, the GUI alone is gonna be *huge*. It's such
> a big feature that a change in the major revision is warranted,
> even if our other big features like JIT compiling or OpenGL are
> still betaish.
>
> 2) It's good marketing. "Octave 4" is a simple, single number to
> remember. It's easy to convey to people which Octave version has
> the GUI, and which Octave version started to make a point of
> also making timely Windows and Mac OS X binary releases.
>
> 3) The ".0" part of "4.0" gives an indication that we are trying
> something big and new here. Then 4.2 and beyond will start
> adding more polish, perhaps JIT or classdef, but for now the
> ".0" will express to our users that this is a major change. I
> hope that this will earn us some leeway and indulgence from our
> users if not everything is great, as long as the GUI is great.
>
> 4) I would like to have a website redesign to go along with the new
> release, and a big "4" would look very nice in this redesign.
>
> I won't be terribly disappointed if we do decide to go with "3.8", but
> "Octave 4" just sounds so nice.
>
> - Jordi G. H.
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikeshedding
>
>
I completely agree and never understood why this should be just another 3.x in
the first place...
What should happen for a 4.0 if not the changes made NOW..
regards
Thorsten