Re: parcellfun debug

[Muhali]

Olaf Till-2 wrote
>> Should I open a bug report and move
>> discussion there?
> 
> I intend to follow this immediately, but if you wan't to have input
> from others, the bug tracker may be better. If you post larger or
> binary material, uploading it to the bug tracker is better.

I am getting closer. it is probably related to loading or not loading the
NaN package. Whatever, I think I just stumbled over the other problem that
parcellfun does not seem to accept two arguments, as in the cellfun example

cellfun ("atan2", {1, 0}, {0, 1})

Am I right?



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/parcellfun-debug-tp4671440p4671507.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.