[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Can I make maintainer status of optim package 'official'? (was: Re: RFC:
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Can I make maintainer status of optim package 'official'? (was: Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim)) |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:21:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Olaf Till wrote:
> ...
> @Carnë
>
> BTW I'm still not 'officially' the maintainer of the optim package,
> but probably this should be changed. Carnë, and others, can I change
> the Maintainer entry in the DESCRIPTION to my address?
Carnë, and others, can comment on this? (Sorry Carnë, I should have
made your address the main recipient before to raise your attention,
but seemingly I only have put it under CC or even forgot this at all.)
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Can I make maintainer status of optim package 'official'? (was: Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim)),
Olaf Till <=