On Sep 18, 2016 4:31 PM, "Naftali Kidron" <
address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Try running my data produced by the testing script testHIST2.m on both hist3, of the statistics package, and on my version hist2. Mine looks more histogram like and more insightful / illustrative. Of course, it is not as sturdy / resilient as hist3.
> Naftali Kidron
> P.S. forgive my Hebrew-English
>
>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Nicholas Jankowski <
address@hidden>
>> To: Carnë Draug <
address@hidden>
>> Cc: octave-maintainers <
address@hidden>; Naftali Kidron <
address@hidden>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 5:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: 2-D histogram
>>
>> I seem to recall there being some discussion about histogram functions in the not too distant past. Is there a current deficiency or non compatibility in octave's current offering?
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2016 6:26 AM, "Carnë Draug" <
address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 September 2016 at 09:50, Naftali Kidron <
address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > I am submitting a 2-D histogram function together with a testing script &
>>> > the plots produced. It is in a very raw form, since I am a user not a
>>> > developer.
>>> >
>>>
>>> There is a 2d histogram function on the statistics package named hist3.
>>> Did you try it?
>>>
>>>
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/ octave/statistics/file/ 7f018b3e3050/inst/hist3.m
>>>
>>> Carnë
>>>
>>
>>