Re: [Om-synth] Re: hey

[Marc-Olivier Barre]

On 7/28/06, Lars Luthman <address@hidden> wrote:
> That tarball did _not_ work for me with 4.1.1, because a function had
> extra qualifications (Classname::function when it was defined inside the
> class) which GCC 4.1.1 does not allow, and because an #include <cassert>
> was missing in a file that used assert(). I would be surprised if you
> got it to build with GCC 4.1.1.

Ok, I admit I may have had to do a small patch... but really nothing
worth mentioning ;-)
And at the time it was not a tarball but a CVS checkout.
But tajing appart the missing "#include <cassert>" and the few extra
qualifications, everything worked fine.

I think I still have the patch at home, for those who are interrested
I can test it against the tarball and post it here.

_____________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Kinoko en Orbite.