[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control
From: |
Gerald Henriksen |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control |
Date: |
Thu, 19 May 2011 22:38:56 -0400 |
On Thu, 19 May 2011 21:59:10 +0000, you wrote:
>Interesting observation re the windows side ...
>
>I have no strong feeling against Hg; our Alembic team is running on with it
>and they seem quite happy.
>The migration path from CVS to git seemed, at least the last time I looked,
>rather more straight forward with git.
>
>My viewpoint is with a nod to perception of the wider acceptance of git over
>Hg, but then perhaps this reflects my *nix centric view of the world :)
git has the widest acceptance in the open source world, while I would
guess most of the Windows world is likely using proprietary source
control systems.
But at the end of the day if you are doing the work, then choose
whichever you are most comfortable using. After all, it is you that
will be responsible for it.
- [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Piotr Stanczyk, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Bob Friesenhahn, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Paul Miller, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Gerald Henriksen, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Bob Friesenhahn, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Ger Hobbelt, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Ger Hobbelt, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Bob Friesenhahn, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, jcupitt, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Ger Hobbelt, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Openexr-devel] Source Control, Ger Hobbelt, 2011/05/20