[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-user] License question
From: |
Mario Fichtenmayer |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-user] License question |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:41:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) |
Hello,
thank you very much for mentioning jGoodies, Daniel.
I used the last days to think again about the license and i came to the
conclusion that the BSD license is completely sufficient for this project.
But i have one last question:
Besides the normal license-header of the source-files and the extra
license-textfile, what's about the following lines:
This library is based on the OpenEXR library from ILM.
Exrforjava is not affiliated to ILM.
For more information about the exr file format in general or the
original C library visit www.openexr.com .
I think about puting this in the readme file.
Does it suffice to mention ILM this way?
Or shouldn't i at all?
Since it might be misunderstandable.
thanks again to Drew and Florian
have a nice day
Mario Fichtenmayer