pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-users] More on 0.11.4 --> 0.13.2.91


From: Bobby D. Bryant
Subject: [Pan-users] More on 0.11.4 --> 0.13.2.91
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 19:43:17 -0600

Here are some more things I have noticed after upgrading. Mostly little stuff, but the old way was really convenient in a lot of cases.

o In the task manager you can no longer select multiple consecutive entries by dragging the mouse across them.

o When using ^s for the save dialog, you no longer get the drop-down list of recent save locations. (You only get the single most recent one, or the default if you just started Pan.)

o If you download an article by clicking it, it shows up in the task manager as "downloading 1 articles" rather than giving the article's subject line as it previously did. (Articles being downloaded as the result of ^s _do_ still show the subject lines in the task manager.)

o If you download an article by _either_ ^s or by clicking it, the status bar at the bottom of the main window shows the article's cryptic ID string rather than the subject line. Having the subject line was really helpful.

o Maybe I just haven't found it yet, but the new Pan seems to be missing the previous function that would let you select a posted image and type 'o' to download, decode, and pop it up in an external viewer such as Electric Eyes.

o When all three panes are showing and the group or article header panes need a horizontal scrollbar, clicking on the bar between the slider and the arrow does not jump-scroll the pane. (However, it _does_ work correctly on the vertical scrollbars. Is this perhaps a GTK issue?)

o In some situations Pan does not properly put an X beside an article that gave "bad article number" when you tried to save it, so when you next visit the newsgroup you cannot tell that you tried to download it and failed. I _think_ this only happens if you move on to another newsgroup before the error occurs. (I think the icon that indicates that a file has been saved to disk is misbehaving in the same way.)

BTW, the new version is noticably more stable, and of course I appreciate the spellchecker. Keep up the good work!

Thanks,

Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]