[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Great job on the speed improvements in the 0.13.3 betas!
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Great job on the speed improvements in the 0.13.3 betas! |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Dec 2002 04:10:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
I haven't seen this mentioned yet, so I thought I'd bring it up. The speed
improvements in the current betas, saving attachments, especially, are so
great as to be a night and day difference! The first few times I tried
saving a series, after 0.13.2.90 came out, I literally thought I'd hit the
hotkey combo wrong or something, and had to dig out my file system browser
and actually go verify the files had been saved! I'd just decided the slow
performance was an artifact of the decoding, and my choice of ReiserFS. Now,
I know it was PAN, because it seems to save a whole 100-ish series as fast as
it formerly saved just the FIRST of the series. I've noticed it doesn't eat
CPU cycles while saving as it did b4, either.
I still have trouble believing that much performance gain was possible in a
single beta release. The only draw-back I've noted is that occasionally the
display doesn't actually list them as all saved, even if they are. It's as
if it is saving them so fast, now, the display thread doesn't have time to
update the visual status, and when the actual save thread returns before the
visual thread is finished updating, the visual thread simply says screw it
and forgets about completing it's job.
Still, I'll definitely take the speed over making sure every last message gets
its status icon changed anyway. However, it WOULD be nice to fix that display
bug b4 stable, as long as it doesn't mean giving up all that speed we just
gained in the process.
--
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Pan-users] Great job on the speed improvements in the 0.13.3 betas!,
Duncan <=