[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: Multiple server support even working?
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: Multiple server support even working? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:57:16 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
Travis <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on Thu, 10
Apr 2008 12:48:18 -0700:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "K. Haley" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden> Sent: Thursday,
> April 10, 2008 12:28 PM Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Multiple server support
> even working?
>
>
>> _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
>>
>>
>
> Why do you send the text of your message as an attachment?
It was shown here (using pan and gmane) as a multipart/mixed MIME message
with the original text content GPG signed and included as the first MIME
part. Below that was the second MIME part, the "Pan-users mailing list"
footer added by the mailing list software.
I suspect the original was sent as a simple single-part MIME message,
complete with GPG-signature. The mailing list software would have then
added the mailing list footer as a second MIME part, converting the
message as a whole into a multipart/mixed message in ordered to add the
second part.
Since they /are/ text, pan displays both parts directly, altho it
separates the gpg/pgp-signature into its own little attachment. When I
have pan save both text and attachments, it creates only one attachment,
the signature, with the entire thing including the sig in the article
file. It's viewing it (in a text editor) that I was able to see the MIME
structure I described above.
I see you are using some sort of MS thing to reply and presumably to
view. No surprise there that it had the body as an attachment.
Actually, that does make a bit of sense, as it would be easier that way
to pass the entire signed part to gpg/pgp/whatever for signature
verification, since it obviously doesn't handle that built-in.
Presumably, if you were using say thunderbird, with the enigmail
extension, to view the post, it would verify the signature. I know kmail
(my mail client) handles such things, but of course, as I said I'm using
gmane and pan, as I said, to view this list as a newsgroup.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman