[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: option for performing dry run
From: |
Cook, Malcolm |
Subject: |
RE: option for performing dry run |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:12:05 -0600 |
> > It would be great if parallel had an option to NOT execute
> the command
> >
> > akin to gnu `make`s --dry-run option.
>
> Let me see if I understand you correctly. What you want is -p
> but without printing '?...' and with the automatic answer 'n'.
exactly
> Is that correct? Do you care if the output is to STDERR or
> STDOUT - or is either fine?
yes!
> /Ole
By the way, I just presented an example of using parallel to a group of
bioinformatics types who were all very happy to know about it.....
- option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/13
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/13
- RE: option for performing dry run,
Cook, Malcolm <=
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/14
- RE: option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/15
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/15
- RE: option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/15
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/15