[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: option for performing dry run
From: |
Ole Tange |
Subject: |
Re: option for performing dry run |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:09:59 +0100 |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Cook, Malcolm <MEC@stowers.org> wrote:
>> > It would be great if parallel had an option to NOT execute
>> the command
>>
>> Let me see if I understand you correctly. What you want is -p
>> but without printing '?...' and with the automatic answer 'n'.
>
> exactly
Please try the git version:
$ parallel --dry-run echo '>' /tmp/{} ::: a b c
echo > /tmp/a
echo > /tmp/b
echo > /tmp/c
$ ls -l /tmp/?
ls: cannot access /tmp/?: No such file or directory
/Ole
- option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/13
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/13
- RE: option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/13
- Re: option for performing dry run,
Ole Tange <=
- RE: option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/15
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/15
- RE: option for performing dry run, Cook, Malcolm, 2010/12/15
- Re: option for performing dry run, Ole Tange, 2010/12/15