Re: [Partysip-dev] static registration problem

[Florian Winterstein]

Hi,

as far I understand a periodic UA registation is required for a config
entry:
user  sip:address@hidden    none none

Regarding the following config entry:

user  sip:address@hidden    none none        sip:address@hidden

What's the difference? Why is the periodic registration in this case not
unnecessary?


Florian


On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:27:33 +0200 (CEST)
Aymeric Moizard <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> Your UA should register frenquently... Did you configure it
> so partysip is its registrar?
> 
> To fix your issue, you can change the timeout value for the
> registration. I guess this can be done in ppl/unix/ppluinfo.c
> Aymeric
> 
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Florian Winterstein wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm testing partysip-0.4.4 with a static user registration of the
> > form:
> >
> > user  sip:address@hidden    none none       
> > sip:address@hidden
> >
> > The registration at the UA is turned off.
> > After starting partysip the registration works fine.
> > Calling sip:address@hidden after a few hours fails because partysip
> > decided to delete the binding (binding expired).
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >     Florian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Partysip-dev mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/partysip-dev
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Partysip-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/partysip-dev
>