Re: [Partysip-dev] Partysip and sipXezPhone running on same machine

[Aymeric Moizard]

If you get a 200ok, it seems it's working fine?

The rport is an extension for routing response: if rport = 5060,
then there should be no difference between using rport or not...
The issue is not there.

Aymeric

On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Pullicino wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am running Partysip (windows) with the sipXezPhone SIP client. When I run
> the client from a remote PC everything works properly however when I run
> Partysip and sipXezPhone from the same machine sipXezPhone fails to register
> with the SIP server.
>
> Has anyone seen this before? Why does this happen?
>
> I noticed this difference in the debug logs when I ran sipXezPhone
> remotely/locally:
>
>
> REMOTE:
>
> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.22.208 <http://192.168.22.208>
> ;branch=z9hG4bK-5723025ddac6645e0b14d858f823b147;rport=5060
> From: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=12d75592
> To: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=3800020077
> Call-ID: beabc5068700389394e7953ef89d6a32
> CSeq: 1 REGISTER
> Contact: <sip:address@hidden
> ;LINEID=2544190561dffec7b9b89a35ac2dcbc6>;expires=300
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
> Notice the rport=5060 on the Via header.
>
>
> LOCAL
>
> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.22.201 <http://192.168.22.201>
> ;branch=z9hG4bK-7b5b7934f538d058d389ad744653ae94
> From: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=57a6535
> To: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=1864852982
> Call-ID: 9877587ce9be4b7b96b9a67f3977cea8
> CSeq: 1 REGISTER
> Contact: <sip:address@hidden
> ;LINEID=76a7004411a2c9bce40071c8dc7a45ce>;expires=300
> Content-Length: 0
>
> Notice no rport in the Via header.
>
>
> If anyone has any pointers I would really appreciate it.
>
> thanks,
> Jeremy.