plex86-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: [Plex86-devel] Release Schedule


From: Eric Laberge
Subject: Fwd: Re: [Plex86-devel] Release Schedule
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:54:13 -0400

Damn! I did it again.

Here's my message:

Subject: Re: [Plex86-devel] Release Schedule
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:36:21 -0400
From: Eric Laberge <address@hidden>
To: "Drew Northup" <address@hidden>

What I'd like are Plex86 and Bochs being different only by loading a
different dynamic library. We should throw the bases of this kind of
modularity and stop having to convert back and forth modifications to either
project. I am experimenting on extensive COM-like modules for Plex86 (and
yes, it is a standard and non-bloated C thing, I agreed not to use C++ in
this project), but I don't want to be alone in this, and most of all, I want
us to agree on a generic and common plugin standard.

BTW, I already have a working new config file format, so don't bother with
this one.

EL
--
Eric Laberge
Jabber ID: address@hidden

GCS/M/S d-(++) s-: a-- C++(++++) UL+++>$ !P L++ E--- W++ N+ w++ !O M
!V PS PE Y PGP-(+++) t++(-) X- R* tv+ b+ DI+++  D+ G e+>+++++ h! r--

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Eric Laberge
Jabber ID: address@hidden

GCS/M/S d-(++) s-: a-- C++(++++) UL+++>$ !P L++ E--- W++ N+ w++ !O M
!V PS PE Y PGP-(+++) t++(-) X- R* tv+ b+ DI+++  D+ G e+>+++++ h! r--



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]