protux-design
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Protux-design] Re: [Protux-devel] how to open PM?


From: Reinhard Amersberger
Subject: Re: [Protux-design] Re: [Protux-devel] how to open PM?
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:06:40 +0100

address@hidden schrieb am 21.01.03 10:38:03:
> 
> Luciano Giordana wrote:
> 
> >The idea is cool. But I dont think we have to follow the initial caracter to 
> >make this.
> >
> yes, that's an important point, similar actions have to stay around the 
> same center key
> 


But we have to pay attantion to keeping the jmb actions as 
intuitive/self-explanatory as possible!



> >We could just use positional variations, such <FR>  . <FE> , <FS> , <FX> or 
> >any other similar stuff
> >


So I think this above is really hard to keep in mind.


> >Also, we have been using the term "Project Manager" more than File Stuff.
> >


Yes, you are right!
But here we have a problem, because 'P' is the center key for 'PAN' stuff, so 
we should try to avoid confusing users!
So <P> or <<P>> should be used to open a 'Pan Properties' dialog to change the 
value of the selected node in a dialog.

Maybe we should think about using another name for PM.


> >so, it could be <P1> <P2> <P3> <P4> , and so on to open diferent tabs 
> >directly or
> >
> ><P0> to simple open the project manager and then type <1> <2> <3> ... inside 
> >it to change the tabs...
> >


Yeah, I like this contextive behavior! :-)



> i really like that idea, but instead of <P0> just <P> to open the PM 
> with the last viewed tab... <Pn>  to open tab n, and <n> to switch to 
> tab n... that's really good... of course <<P>> stays GlobalProperties...
> 
> /Martin


Again the PAN problem.
But we could continue the old discussion thread started in jmb.map ?

# Settings stuff - CENTER KEY : Right_Control
"GLOBAL PROPERTIES"                      <<K>>   0 0    0x0050          0 # 
<<P>>  # could be <<SE>> ?
# "COMPONENT PROPERTIES"                   <K>     0 0    0x0050          0 # 
<P>    # could be <SE> ?
# LG : you were right Reinhard, next action conflicts with n..[P]. Now what !??
# RA : We could use 'SE' that should mean 'SEttings' ?
#      This conflicts with 'SELECT ENVELOPES' stuff, but 'SELECT ENVELOPES' is 
another story, because I think this
#      should be a contextive action in the future.
# COMPONENT INFO                         [K]     0 0    0x0050          0 # [P] 
   # could be [SE] ?




RFC
Reinhard
______________________________________________________________________________
Mit der Gruppen-SMS von WEB.DE FreeMail erreichen Sie mit einem Klick 
alle Freunde gleichzeitig! http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021180





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]