[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Protux-devel] No more FFTW
From: |
Reinhard Amersberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Protux-devel] No more FFTW |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:33:23 +0200 |
> Guess what ? I found a public-domain FFT implementation in C, I made some
> hacks and now it seems to be faster that FFTW calls (when optimized for a
> spectrum analisys in MustuxFFT class).
Sometimes TOO FAST? ;-)
Because there is graphical activity before a clip is touched by the
float_cursor ..... (just kidding! :-)
But actually (1. aug 2002) the float_cursor is pretty in sync with the peaks!
Just for info:
Mute a Track has no effect on the spectrogram output.
Only muting clips is working.
I mean ... the spectrogram use the audio data of a Track (the Clips) even if
this Track is muted.
greetings
Reinhard
______________________________________________________________________________
WEB.DE MyPage - Ohne Computerkenntnisse in nur 5 Minuten online! Alles
inklusive! Kinderleicht! http://www.das.ist.aber.ne.lustige.sache.ms/
- Re: [Protux-devel] No more FFTW,
Reinhard Amersberger <=