[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Protux-devel] No more FFTW
From: |
Luciano Giordana |
Subject: |
Re: [Protux-devel] No more FFTW |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:27:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
I Know, I am still improving it, but the main part is that now I can apply
better some HPS algorithm to find the pitch of what is being
played/recorded. It is the first step for SharpSing filter.
On Monday 02 September 2002 04:33, Reinhard Amersberger wrote:
> > Guess what ? I found a public-domain FFT implementation in C, I made some
> > hacks and now it seems to be faster that FFTW calls (when optimized for a
> > spectrum analisys in MustuxFFT class).
>
> Sometimes TOO FAST? ;-)
> Because there is graphical activity before a clip is touched by the
> float_cursor ..... (just kidding! :-)
>
> But actually (1. aug 2002) the float_cursor is pretty in sync with the
> peaks!
>
> Just for info:
> Mute a Track has no effect on the spectrogram output.
> Only muting clips is working.
> I mean ... the spectrogram use the audio data of a Track (the Clips) even
> if this Track is muted.
>
> greetings
> Reinhard
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>___ WEB.DE MyPage - Ohne Computerkenntnisse in nur 5 Minuten online! Alles
> inklusive! Kinderleicht! http://www.das.ist.aber.ne.lustige.sache.ms/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Protux-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel