[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Assertion in sort.c
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Assertion in sort.c |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:25:20 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 06:20:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
That's okay. The casefile code doesn't always initialize the
entire buffer it writes to disk, but in that case it ignores
those bytes when it reads them back from disk. It's generally
due to padding bytes between string variables added for alignment
reasons, and you can happily ignore it.
Right thanks for the explanation.
Would it be a good idea to initialise all the bytes anyway so that
we can easily see any real problems that valgrind might uncover, or
would that cause too much overhead?
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://wwwkeys.pgp.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
pgpTHG8k9NHs3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, (continued)
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, John Darrington, 2005/01/06
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, John Darrington, 2005/01/06
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, John Darrington, 2005/01/07
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/07
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/08
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/09
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, John Darrington, 2005/01/09
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/09
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, John Darrington, 2005/01/16
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/16
- Re: Assertion in sort.c,
John Darrington <=
- Re: Assertion in sort.c, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/17
Re: Assertion in sort.c, John Darrington, 2005/01/06