[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
optimizations, was Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
optimizations, was Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:49:17 +0100 (CET) |
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Laurent Amon wrote:
>
> On 17 déc. 04, at 00:10, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>
> > x86 on x86 optimization is now the top item on my TODO list...
> >
> I hope you will not forget us poor mac users. Optimizing x86 on ppc
> performance would make a number of people very happy, I'd say.
>
> Pretty please?
If I understand all of those ideas correctly, then it's very likely that
ppc gets a lot of those optimizations, too. The only (obvious) thing which
doesn't make ppc host faster is code copy.
Ciao,
Dscho
- [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Adrian Smarzewski, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Laurent Amon, 2004/12/16
- optimizations, was Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?,
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Herbert Poetzl, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Paul Brook, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, John R. Hogerhuis, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, André Braga, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Herbert Poetzl, 2004/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Adrian Smarzewski, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Herbert Poetzl, 2004/12/18
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Ryan Underwood, 2004/12/16
RE: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Andreas Bollhalder, 2004/12/17