[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test
From: |
M. Warner Losh |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:47:18 -0700 (MST) |
In message: <address@hidden>
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" <address@hidden> writes:
:
: > Except that compilers use the convention that was described above.
: > Big endian MIPS definitely uses a different bit ordering for C bit
: > fields than little endian MIPS.
:
: There is actually a difference between *bitfield* ordering and *bit*
: ordering. The former always follows the byte ordering, whereas the latter
: is only a property of the ISA and has no influence on the ABI or API.
True, but that's not what the original poster in this thread was
asking. Answering the different question is just confusing to the
original poster.
Warner
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, Thiemo Seufer, 2007/03/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, Stuart Brady, 2007/03/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, M. Warner Losh, 2007/03/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, Paul Brook, 2007/03/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, M. Warner Losh, 2007/03/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, M. Warner Losh, 2007/03/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test,
M. Warner Losh <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pcnet32 driver change, please test, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/03