[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu-accel: unbreak non-default accelerators

[Jan Kiszka]

Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:37:37PM +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Make noaccel accelerator "registered" early so that
>> kqemu has a change to be enabled (it's registered
>> via __constructor__ feature, so called before main()).
> fyi: we're probably changing that. There has been a lot of mail exchange
> this days about the general acceptability of this feature, and the overall

[ That was a private discussion, I guess. ]

> feeling is that it's a negative construct. So if the problem you hit happens 
> because
> the constructor itself, it's probably worthy to drop it altogether, and 
> invest time
> in a new method for registering the accelerators.

Do you plan to update/rebase QEMUAccel in the near future? Or what is
the short-term roadmap of this approach?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux